Surgically Relevant Anatomy of Marfan Vertebrae (2025)

Abstract

Background: Understanding vertebral anatomy is crucial for the secure fixation of spinal instrumentation. Using MRI and CT scans can identify safe locations for pedicle screw insertion and/or discover underlying pathologies such as dural ectasia. In this study, we explored Marfan vertebrae morphology and compared it to that of idiopathic scoliotic vertebrae. We investigated whether the pedicles and laminae of patients with Marfan syndrome (1) would differ from those with idiopathic scoliosis (IS) and (2) would be affected by the position in the curve and by dural ectasia. Methods: Using MRI and CT scans, the morphologies of 134 vertebrae from T1 to L5 were measured in 16 Marfan patients with spine deformity. The morphologies of 140 vertebrae in 20 patients with IS were measured in the same fashion. They were then compared with each other. Results: Marfan pedicle channels were significantly thinner than those with idiopathic scoliosis (P<0.001). This difference increased significantly from cranial to caudal. Type D pedicles (<2 mm wide) were found in 34% of Marfan and 9% of IS patients (P<0.001). Marfan type D pedicles were found in 36% of atypical locations (outside the concave apex). Pedicle width significantly correlated with both vertebral level and distance from the apex. Pedicles became progressively thinner than IS pedicles at descending levels of the spine. Pedicle width and laminar thickness measurements on CT and MRI did not differ significantly. The average thickness of the Marfan lamina was significantly thinner (by a mean of 1 mm) than that of the IS lamina (P<0.001). Marfan patients with dural ectasia had significantly thinner laminae in the lumbar spine than those without (P=0.023). Conclusions: Marfan spines were associated with thinning of fixation sites, most pronounced at the curve apex. Laminar thinning was more common on the concavity and with dural ectasia. Radiographs often overestimate the width. Therefore, preoperative MRI or CT is helpful when operating on Marfan spine with pedicle screws and laminar hooks.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number10.1097/BPO.0000000000002968
JournalJournal of Pediatric Orthopaedics
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2025

Keywords

  • anatomy
  • connective tissue disorder
  • Marfan syndrome
  • scoliosis
  • spine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

  • APA
  • Standard
  • Harvard
  • Vancouver
  • Author
  • BIBTEX
  • RIS

Cha, M. J., Elnemer, W. (Accepted/In press). Surgically Relevant Anatomy of Marfan Vertebrae. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, Article 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002968. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000002968

Surgically Relevant Anatomy of Marfan Vertebrae. / Cha, Myung Jin; Elnemer, William; Sponseller, Paul D.
In: Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 2025.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Cha, MJ, Elnemer, W 2025, 'Surgically Relevant Anatomy of Marfan Vertebrae', Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000002968

Cha MJ, Elnemer W, Sponseller PD. Surgically Relevant Anatomy of Marfan Vertebrae. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 2025;10.1097/BPO.0000000000002968. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002968

Cha, Myung Jin ; Elnemer, William ; Sponseller, Paul D. / Surgically Relevant Anatomy of Marfan Vertebrae. In: Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 2025.

@article{f48caf2c44e44524bcb3fe6be18297c0,

title = "Surgically Relevant Anatomy of Marfan Vertebrae",

abstract = "Background: Understanding vertebral anatomy is crucial for the secure fixation of spinal instrumentation. Using MRI and CT scans can identify safe locations for pedicle screw insertion and/or discover underlying pathologies such as dural ectasia. In this study, we explored Marfan vertebrae morphology and compared it to that of idiopathic scoliotic vertebrae. We investigated whether the pedicles and laminae of patients with Marfan syndrome (1) would differ from those with idiopathic scoliosis (IS) and (2) would be affected by the position in the curve and by dural ectasia. Methods: Using MRI and CT scans, the morphologies of 134 vertebrae from T1 to L5 were measured in 16 Marfan patients with spine deformity. The morphologies of 140 vertebrae in 20 patients with IS were measured in the same fashion. They were then compared with each other. Results: Marfan pedicle channels were significantly thinner than those with idiopathic scoliosis (P<0.001). This difference increased significantly from cranial to caudal. Type D pedicles (<2 mm wide) were found in 34% of Marfan and 9% of IS patients (P<0.001). Marfan type D pedicles were found in 36% of atypical locations (outside the concave apex). Pedicle width significantly correlated with both vertebral level and distance from the apex. Pedicles became progressively thinner than IS pedicles at descending levels of the spine. Pedicle width and laminar thickness measurements on CT and MRI did not differ significantly. The average thickness of the Marfan lamina was significantly thinner (by a mean of 1 mm) than that of the IS lamina (P<0.001). Marfan patients with dural ectasia had significantly thinner laminae in the lumbar spine than those without (P=0.023). Conclusions: Marfan spines were associated with thinning of fixation sites, most pronounced at the curve apex. Laminar thinning was more common on the concavity and with dural ectasia. Radiographs often overestimate the width. Therefore, preoperative MRI or CT is helpful when operating on Marfan spine with pedicle screws and laminar hooks.",

keywords = "anatomy, connective tissue disorder, Marfan syndrome, scoliosis, spine",

author = "Cha, {Myung Jin} and William Elnemer and Sponseller, {Paul D.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: Copyright {\textcopyright} 2025 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.",

year = "2025",

doi = "10.1097/BPO.0000000000002968",

language = "English (US)",

journal = "Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics",

issn = "0271-6798",

publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surgically Relevant Anatomy of Marfan Vertebrae

AU - Cha, Myung Jin

AU - Elnemer, William

AU - Sponseller, Paul D.

N1 - Publisher Copyright:Copyright © 2025 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2025

Y1 - 2025

N2 - Background: Understanding vertebral anatomy is crucial for the secure fixation of spinal instrumentation. Using MRI and CT scans can identify safe locations for pedicle screw insertion and/or discover underlying pathologies such as dural ectasia. In this study, we explored Marfan vertebrae morphology and compared it to that of idiopathic scoliotic vertebrae. We investigated whether the pedicles and laminae of patients with Marfan syndrome (1) would differ from those with idiopathic scoliosis (IS) and (2) would be affected by the position in the curve and by dural ectasia. Methods: Using MRI and CT scans, the morphologies of 134 vertebrae from T1 to L5 were measured in 16 Marfan patients with spine deformity. The morphologies of 140 vertebrae in 20 patients with IS were measured in the same fashion. They were then compared with each other. Results: Marfan pedicle channels were significantly thinner than those with idiopathic scoliosis (P<0.001). This difference increased significantly from cranial to caudal. Type D pedicles (<2 mm wide) were found in 34% of Marfan and 9% of IS patients (P<0.001). Marfan type D pedicles were found in 36% of atypical locations (outside the concave apex). Pedicle width significantly correlated with both vertebral level and distance from the apex. Pedicles became progressively thinner than IS pedicles at descending levels of the spine. Pedicle width and laminar thickness measurements on CT and MRI did not differ significantly. The average thickness of the Marfan lamina was significantly thinner (by a mean of 1 mm) than that of the IS lamina (P<0.001). Marfan patients with dural ectasia had significantly thinner laminae in the lumbar spine than those without (P=0.023). Conclusions: Marfan spines were associated with thinning of fixation sites, most pronounced at the curve apex. Laminar thinning was more common on the concavity and with dural ectasia. Radiographs often overestimate the width. Therefore, preoperative MRI or CT is helpful when operating on Marfan spine with pedicle screws and laminar hooks.

AB - Background: Understanding vertebral anatomy is crucial for the secure fixation of spinal instrumentation. Using MRI and CT scans can identify safe locations for pedicle screw insertion and/or discover underlying pathologies such as dural ectasia. In this study, we explored Marfan vertebrae morphology and compared it to that of idiopathic scoliotic vertebrae. We investigated whether the pedicles and laminae of patients with Marfan syndrome (1) would differ from those with idiopathic scoliosis (IS) and (2) would be affected by the position in the curve and by dural ectasia. Methods: Using MRI and CT scans, the morphologies of 134 vertebrae from T1 to L5 were measured in 16 Marfan patients with spine deformity. The morphologies of 140 vertebrae in 20 patients with IS were measured in the same fashion. They were then compared with each other. Results: Marfan pedicle channels were significantly thinner than those with idiopathic scoliosis (P<0.001). This difference increased significantly from cranial to caudal. Type D pedicles (<2 mm wide) were found in 34% of Marfan and 9% of IS patients (P<0.001). Marfan type D pedicles were found in 36% of atypical locations (outside the concave apex). Pedicle width significantly correlated with both vertebral level and distance from the apex. Pedicles became progressively thinner than IS pedicles at descending levels of the spine. Pedicle width and laminar thickness measurements on CT and MRI did not differ significantly. The average thickness of the Marfan lamina was significantly thinner (by a mean of 1 mm) than that of the IS lamina (P<0.001). Marfan patients with dural ectasia had significantly thinner laminae in the lumbar spine than those without (P=0.023). Conclusions: Marfan spines were associated with thinning of fixation sites, most pronounced at the curve apex. Laminar thinning was more common on the concavity and with dural ectasia. Radiographs often overestimate the width. Therefore, preoperative MRI or CT is helpful when operating on Marfan spine with pedicle screws and laminar hooks.

KW - anatomy

KW - connective tissue disorder

KW - Marfan syndrome

KW - scoliosis

KW - spine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105003975565&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105003975565&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002968

DO - 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002968

M3 - Article

C2 - 40272162

AN - SCOPUS:105003975565

SN - 0271-6798

JO - Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics

JF - Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics

M1 - 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002968

ER -

Surgically Relevant Anatomy of Marfan Vertebrae (2025)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Recommended Articles
Article information

Author: Rubie Ullrich

Last Updated:

Views: 5865

Rating: 4.1 / 5 (72 voted)

Reviews: 95% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Rubie Ullrich

Birthday: 1998-02-02

Address: 743 Stoltenberg Center, Genovevaville, NJ 59925-3119

Phone: +2202978377583

Job: Administration Engineer

Hobby: Surfing, Sailing, Listening to music, Web surfing, Kitesurfing, Geocaching, Backpacking

Introduction: My name is Rubie Ullrich, I am a enthusiastic, perfect, tender, vivacious, talented, famous, delightful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.